[lazarus] qt status?

[Florian Klaempfl]

Andrew Johnson wrote:
> alright. that sounds good. I will go look into that, and if moc _does_
> produces cohesive enough ones, such that we don't need to actually
> include any of the actual translations and upkeep them ourselves, it
> might make usage easier anyway, since we could just require moc and have
> a script to compile things properly and link resulting c objects and
> pascal objects and stuff, perhaps in a lazarus package like the gtk2
> one. And if not.. well we shall see. :)
> 

I started a pascal output module for moc already some time ago but I 
didn't finish it. I'll see if I can dig it out.