[Lazarus] Why we chose Object Pascal instead
Coppola Ing. Salvatore
coppolastudio at gmail.com
Sat Apr 18 17:27:59 CEST 2009
Giuliano Colla wrote:
> waldo kitty ha scritto:
>
>> Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
>>
>>> Graeme Geldenhuys schrieb:
>>>
>>>
>>>> I can't agree more... We have had this exact same issue in our company
>>>> (before I arrived). They hired cheap (inexperienced) developers that
>>>> caused havoc in the code. They make the GUI seem fine for a while, but
>>>> underneath the design (if there actually was a design) is totally
>>>> rubbish and unable to cope with new requirements. Hence the reason I
>>>> was commissioned to do a total rewrite.
>>>>
>>> That's why neither Cobol nor VB will ever die: they make secure
>>> long-term jobs
>>>
>> that's also why "real coders" do not comment their source code ;)
>>
>>
>
> We had a guy who'd found an even more clever way. He did comment the
> code, but his comments reported what the code didn't do, instead of what
> the code was doing. Sort of an embedded and disguised TODO list, which
> could easily lead to believe that a feature was implemented, when
> actually it wasn't!
>
>
>
he, he.. !! very funny (ho riso di cuore!) :-D
More information about the Lazarus
mailing list