[Lazarus] Why we chose Object Pascal instead

[Coppola Ing. Salvatore]

Giuliano Colla wrote:
> waldo kitty ha scritto:
>   
>> Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
>>     
>>> Graeme Geldenhuys schrieb:
>>>
>>>       
>>>> I can't agree more... We have had this exact same issue in our company
>>>> (before I arrived). They hired cheap (inexperienced) developers that
>>>> caused havoc in the code. They make the GUI seem fine for a while, but
>>>> underneath the design (if there actually was a design) is totally
>>>> rubbish and unable to cope with new requirements. Hence the reason I
>>>> was commissioned to do a total rewrite.
>>>>         
>>> That's why neither Cobol nor VB will ever die: they make secure 
>>> long-term jobs
>>>       
>> that's also why "real coders" do not comment their source code ;)
>>
>>     
>
> We had a guy who'd found an even more clever way. He did comment the 
> code, but his comments reported what the code didn't do, instead of what 
> the code was doing. Sort of an embedded and disguised TODO list, which 
> could easily lead to believe that a feature was implemented, when 
> actually it wasn't!
>
>
>   
he, he.. !! very funny (ho riso di cuore!) :-D