[Lazarus] Release 1.0, part 2

[Alexsander Rosa]

I second that - 1.0rc is the best solution.

2009/11/30 zeljko <zeljko at holobit.net>

> On Monday 30 November 2009 09:33, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
>
> > So this proves the point that a version number 1.0 wouldn't change
> > anything :) It was FPC which broke things apparently being at version
> > 2.2.x.
>
> You're right, but you can say fpc-1.0 is there, we cannot say lazarus-1.0
> is
> there, that's a *big* diff (in the heads of many users - especially for
> users
> which comes from windows).
> Personally, I don't care if lazarus is v0.002 currently because it suits my
> needs (I'm unix/linux user for all my life - so perfectly understand what
> version number means), but for many users "0.9.28.XX beta" doesn't look
> nice.
> I think that Paul's proposal for 1.0rc instead of 0.9.30 is a good idea.
> Even fpc (2.2.X, 2.4.X, 2.5X) have "children's pain" like
> http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=13722 etc...
>
> zeljko
>
>

-- 
Atenciosamente,
Alexsander da Rosa
Linux User #113925

"Extremismo na defesa da liberdade não é defeito.
Moderação na busca por justiça não é virtude."
-- Barry Goldwater
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lazarus-ide.org/pipermail/lazarus/attachments/20091130/d851abc2/attachment-0004.html>