[Lazarus] Building and running Lazarus natively on various architectures

[Mark Morgan Lloyd]

Henry Vermaak wrote:
> On 08/10/10 10:51, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
>> This thread is a summary of intermittent experience over the last year
>> or so with Lazarus running natively on various platforms. I hope to
>> cover ARM, PPC, SPARC and (for completeness) x86 on Linux (Debian v5
>> "Lenny"), possibly also some older Windows OSes on x86 (NT, W2K); I'm
>> afraid that I don't have an x64 system which I think would cover all
>> currently-supported CPUs.
>>
>> Mattias, noting your
>>
>>> 0.9.29 with fpc 2.4.0 or higher.
>>
>> I'll work with sources from svn. This might mean that I'm a day or so
>> behind in some cases since some of the older machines will take more
>> than a day doing a full build.
>>
>>
>> ARM (armel) on Debian "Lenny"
>> -----------------------------

>> EAccessViolation : Access violation
>> $00086C50
>> $000F6A30
>> $00140F5C
>> $0011FF78
>> $0013648C
>> $0013FDA0
>> $00140950
>> $0011FF78
>> $0013648C
>> $0013FDA0
>> $00140950
>> $0011FF78
>> $00024370
>> $00008304
> 
> Why don't you build your compiler with -O- -gl?

I thought I had but I'll check... the version of the compiler I'm 
running was built with  make NOGDB=1 OPT=-gl -vt -dFPC_ARMEL -CfSOFT all 
  which I've generally found to give usable backtraces etc. Is adding 
-O- a useful precaution?

-- 
Mark Morgan Lloyd
markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk

[Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues]