[Lazarus] Release schedule and policy

waldo kitty wkitty42 at windstream.net
Tue Oct 26 02:07:57 CEST 2010


On 10/25/2010 04:20, Lukasz Sokol wrote:
> good idea, but what actually stops us from adopting the Linux model ?
>
> Each developer has his own git tree and lets everybody know to pull from it (and what
> to pull) when time comes.
>
> Then, the 'boss' merges 'new features and regfression- and bugfixes', into trunk,
> also cutting-edge development happens there.
>
> Then, everybody interested in fixing regressions also have a git tree where they commit,
> and it is (if applicable) also applied to trunk. As this tree is 'always stable' i.e.
> the API and ABI are frozen there, this is what most non-developer people would use
> and report regressions to.

the first thing i see is "too many branches, too many trees" and there's also 
the recent discussion about "need to know the names of the branches/trees for 
the features" and "i have an u script" :P ;)

FWTW and a really huge :)

;)




More information about the Lazarus mailing list