[Lazarus] Is the lazarus fixes_0_9_28 branch maintained?

[Bo Berglund]

On Sun, 02 Jan 2011 20:35:13 +0100, Sven Barth
<pascaldragon at googlemail.com> wrote:

>On 02.01.2011 20:31, Vincent Snijders wrote:
>> 2011/1/2 Sven Barth<pascaldragon at googlemail.com>:
>>> On 02.01.2011 18:07, Bo Berglund wrote:
>>>>
>>>> But now I wonder if I should go for trunk or the fixes_0_9_28 branch?
>>>> If I remember correctly I have seen that the fixes_0_9_28 branch is no
>>>> longer maintained, is this really so?
>>
>> Yes, it is not maintained anymore.
>>
>>>> Is there some other branch I should use rather than trunk?
>>>
>>> You could try fixes_0_9_30. It's currently prepared for new release so it
>>> might be more stable than trunk and it's definitly better than fixes_0_9_28.
>>>
>>> You could also use the provided snapshots that include FPC 2.4.2 as well
>>> (they are named 0.9.29 currently, trunk is now 0.9.31). They are provided
>>> here: ftp://ftp.freepascal.org/pub/lazarus/snapshots/
>>>
>>>
>>
>> I couldn't have said it better.
>
>Thanks ^^
>

THanks both of you!
I am now getting the fixes_0_9_30 branch in addition to the trunk I
already retrieved. I also got the fixes_0_9_28 branch before, but I
will delete it now.

Concerning FPC I like to have it separate from Lazarus so I will use
the release version 2.4.2 for my further work.

How would I get an fpc cross-compiler for ARM embedded targets?
My target runs an embedded version of Debian. But I work in
Windows....


-- 
Bo Berglund
Developer in Sweden