[Lazarus] SEGFAULT: difference between pointer and dynarray?

[xrfang]

PluaL_Reg is defined by lua52.pas.   In the email I omitted irrelevant code, but full source is attached in the first email. 

在 六, 12月 29, 2012 at 3:13 下午，Flávio Etrusco <flavio.etrusco at gmail.com> 写道：
Your code sample doesn't have a declaration for PluaL_Reg (and you 
don't use the TluaLReg type). Was it a simple copy'n'paste error or is 
it declared by the Lua wrapper? 

On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 4:00 AM, xrfang wrote: 
> Sorry, we are talking about same thing. In my program I am using dynamic 
> array, NOT static, but the assembly is same. In leledumbo's example, the 
> assembly is differnt. 
> 
> 在 六, 12月 29, 2012 at 2:55 下午，Hans-Peter Diettrich 写道： 
> 
> leledumbo schrieb: 
>>> The Assembler shows that @lib and @lib[0] are exactly same thing. 
> 
> That's true for static arrays. 
> 
>> The following program shows that they are NOT the same 
> 
> That's true for dynamic (managed) arrays. 
> 
> You're talking about different array types. 
> 
> DoDi 
> 
> 
> -- 
> _______________________________________________ 
> Lazarus mailing list 
> Lazarus at lists.lazarus.freepascal.org 
> http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> _______________________________________________ 
> Lazarus mailing list 
> Lazarus at lists.lazarus.freepascal.org 
> http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus 
> 

-- 
_______________________________________________ 
Lazarus mailing list 
Lazarus at lists.lazarus.freepascal.org 
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lazarus-ide.org/pipermail/lazarus/attachments/20121229/027babf3/attachment-0003.html>