[Lazarus] Should the "at" word be painted as reserved word ?

[Paul Ishenin]

13.02.2012 10:13, Bernd пишет:
> 2012/2/12 ik<idokan at gmail.com>:
>
>> Raise Exception.Create('') at get_caller_frame(get_frame);
>>
>> Does not paint the "at" code as reserve word.
>> It is not a reserved word according to the documentation, but on this
>> specific case, it act as one imho.
>
> According to my "Sprachgefühl" this cannot be anything other than a
> reserved word. Its not an identifier, its not an operator, it can only
> be a reserved word.

At is not a reserved word. It works only in the context of a raise 
statement.

Best regards,
Paul Ishenin