[Lazarus] Lazarus 0.9.30.4RC2 available for download

Mark Morgan Lloyd markMLl.lazarus at telemetry.co.uk
Thu Mar 8 19:59:14 CET 2012


Vincent Snijders wrote:
> Op 8 maart 2012 19:19 heeft Mark Morgan Lloyd
> <markMLl.lazarus at telemetry.co.uk> het volgende geschreven:
>> Vincent Snijders wrote:
>>> Op 8 maart 2012 12:53 heeft Mark Morgan Lloyd
>>> <markMLl.lazarus at telemetry.co.uk> het volgende geschreven:
>>>> 0.9.31 at 35818 using 2.7.1 is OK apart from the form problem.
>>>>
>>>> 0.9.30.4RC1 built from /tags/lazarus_0_9_30_4RC1 using 2.6.0 has the
>>>> problem.
>>>>
>>>> Which versions do you want me to try next?
>>>
>>> 0.9.30.2 built from /tags/lazarus_0_9_30_2 using 2.4,4 or 2.6.0 (2.6.0
>>> probably won't work)
>>
>> C&P from my build scripts to try to keep tab on what's happening. This one
>> still fails:
>>
>> LAZTAG=/tags/lazarus_0_9_30_2
>> USEFPC=2.6.0
>>
>> Reverting to 2.4.4:
>>
>> LAZTAG=/tags/lazarus_0_9_30_2
>> USEFPC=2.4.4
>>
>> Also fails. I can say with a fair degree of confidence that 0.9.30 and
>> 0.9.30.1 (both on 2.4.4 with GTK2) are OK, but I moved off them towards
>> trunk because of code generator problems, and haven't recently exercised
>> them very hard on SPARC due to form-reading issues that rather got
>> overshadowed by other work.
>>
>> Next tags/releases to test?
> 
> No, thanks.
> 
> Looking at your test results, I don't consider this issue in
> 0.9.30.4RC2 a regression compared to 0.9.30.2 and it will be fixed in
> the next release from trunk.

Whatever, I've got it: Ludo's patches (specifically align_all.diff) from 
issue 19109 haven't been applied. This will also affect at least some 
ARM variants.

-- 
Mark Morgan Lloyd
markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk

[Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues]




More information about the Lazarus mailing list