[Lazarus] New compiler options page "Additions and Overrides"

[Martin]

On 11/06/2013 17:54, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 17:15:25 +0100
> Martin <lazarus at mfriebe.de> wrote:
>
>> On 11/06/2013 17:05, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
>>> On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 10:56:20 +0100
>>> Martin <lazarus at mfriebe.de> wrote:
>>>
>>>> [...]
>>>>> A broader column means less space
>>>>> for the modes and options. The abbreviations IDE,LPI and LPS are not as
>>>>> clear as a sentence. It's not one grid, there are three, so some
>>>>> disruption is needed.
>>>> At the moment the grid usus a lot more vertical than horizontal space.
>>> Yes, the design maximizes the space for the value to avoid horizontal
>>> scrolling.
>> IMHO the risk of horizontal scrolling is far less a problem, than the
>> disruption caused to the grid, by the additional vertical spacing.
> What is the "risk of disruption"?
>
sorry not "risk" since it actually is presence.

The disruptions of the grid by the rows inserted for the sections (that 
is what the whole discussion is about)

It also exist by the rows inserted for "targets" but there I can see a 
point in it, and the cost/benefit is slightly better....
But accepting it for the targets does not mean that it needs to be there 
for the storage sections too.

This is a question of visual representation only. This is not about 
changing any of the functionality.