[Lazarus] Lazarus 1.2 not compiling with FPC 3.0.1

Mark Morgan Lloyd markMLl.lazarus at telemetry.co.uk
Sun Jan 11 12:13:43 CET 2015


zeljko wrote:
> On 01/11/2015 04:23 AM, Anthony Walter wrote:
>> Oh, and here is an extra bit of information I neglected to mention. When
>> I use FPC 3.0.1 to compile against the trunk version of Lazarus, there
>> are no errors.
>>
>> The point is, I think we should have a fixes version of Lazarus which
>> can build with the new fixes 3.0 version of FPC.
> 
> Don't expect that lazarus 1.2 will be changed to be compileable with fpc 
> 3.0 (in that case someone may ask same thing for lazarus 1.0). Trunk 
> compiles with 3.0, so lazarus 1.4 will be able to compile with fpc-3.0.

I'm currently trying to test some of the less-common architectures with 
the end-of-era 2.7.1 and Lazarus trunk. Obviously this is a personal 
effort, but on occasion some sort of marker indicating which 
version/revisions on the FPC and Lazarus svn systems /should/ work 
together would be useful.

I've had a lot of hardware problems over the last year, and in several 
cases finding the correct combination of compiler and LCL that would 
allow me to reconstruct a particular binary was tricky. I've spent a bit 
of time over the weekend working out ways that I can insert the svn 
revision numbers of all relevant parts (i.e. a project itself, FPC and 
Lazarus) into a binary when it's built, but that's not much help for 
some of the older binaries particularly those which had to be built with 
FPC 2.7.1 due to code generation issues.

-- 
Mark Morgan Lloyd
markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk

[Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues]




More information about the Lazarus mailing list