[Lazarus] Theoretical question about future of Lazarus

[Vincenzo Campanella]

Il 12.10.2015 17:58, Bart ha scritto:
> Well, I would vote for 2.0 for the next stable release that comes with
> the 3.0 compiler.
> We can then get rid of all code that is win9x compatible etc.
> This will cleanup the LCL a bit.
> Especially if we also then decide that 2.0 will NOT support the fpc
> 2.6 branch (the cp-aware strings and "utf8 in lcl" tend to give plenty
> of ifdef-ed code).
>
> Just my 2 cents.
>

+2 (cents)... :)

---
Questa e-mail è stata controllata per individuare virus con Avast antivirus.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus