<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Il 27/06/2014 19:16, Juha Manninen ha
scritto:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAPN1EhCdCFrVXdBUE5-h57H-FAPuy76RhhSjfckjJh0zrgu-Hg@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">On Friday, June 27, 2014, Giuliano Colla <<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:giuliano.colla@fastwebnet.it">giuliano.colla@fastwebnet.it</a>>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
I did consider this possibility because we have hundreds of
Kylix projects which are still alive, and need maintenance.
Kylix IDE can only be used on old platforms/virtual machines but
the compiler and the applications still run in the most recent
ones.<br>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Can they also bind to recent QT versions? I doubt.</div>
</blockquote>
Why should I care about a recent Qt version? They bind to their
libborqt.so which provides what required. <br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAPN1EhCdCFrVXdBUE5-h57H-FAPuy76RhhSjfckjJh0zrgu-Hg@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div>My opinion is that you are heading to a dead end. You must
work hard before the design mediator works, and then you can
support a dead environment.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
</blockquote>
I don't care too much about being "modern". I claim that the best
solution is always the most appropriate, not the "newest".<br>
Tombstones are still made of stone. It's stone age technology, but
it's the most appropriate up to now. Only if someone comes out with
something better they will be finally dropped.<br>
When I'll find something more appropriate for my applications, I'll
drop Kylix with no regrets.<br>
<br>
Giuliano<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>