<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 12/01/15 08:27, Sven Barth wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAFMUeB_gwNg029e+9o684QzjhaWQU=axE35MktApe+t178or+Q@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<p>Am 12.01.2015 07:55 schrieb "zeljko" <<a
moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:zeljko@holobit.net">zeljko@holobit.net</a>>:<br>
><br>
> On 01/11/2015 04:58 PM, Joao Morais wrote:<br>
>><br>
>> Em 05/01/15 13:54, Marco van de Voort escreveu:<br>
>>><br>
>>> As a first step in the 3.0.0 release process the
stable branch was<br>
>>> branched<br>
>>> off to branches/fixes_3_0 and the version number
was updated to 3.0.1<br>
>><br>
>> Which version the 3.0 branch will have just after 3.0
release?<br>
><br>
> fixes_3_0 will be ver. 3.0.2 (after 3.0.0 release).</p>
<p>No, it will stay at 3.0.1. Only after 3.0.2 is released it wil
be increased to 3.0.3. Take a look at fixes_2_6 to see what I
mean... (which is currently at 2.6.5)</p>
</blockquote>
<br>
What version number RCs will receive?<br>
<br>
2.9.x or 2.99.x sounds a bit more... suitable, it was the version
number management used for ages iirc.<br>
<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>