<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix"><br>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On 12/09/2015 11:45 AM, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:56682B60.7040800@lumino.de" type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
charset=ISO-8859-1">
<blockquote type="cite">
<div class="moz-text-plain" wrap="true" graphical-quote="true"
style="font-size: 13px;" lang="x-western">Please take a look
at the NoGUI widgetset. It does not use another
Queue. </div>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
If it does not use "another queue" but the one provided by the fpc
RTL (i.e. does not install it's own queue), and (obviously) does not
use a queue that is related to a GUI, it does not provide a queue
art all. <br>
<br>
So it does not provide an Event-Handling infrastructure and this (in
according to my terms) means it is not a ("Delphi Style")
application, hence not a "Service Application". <br>
<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:56682B60.7040800@lumino.de" type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<div class="moz-text-plain" wrap="true" graphical-quote="true"
style="font-size: 13px;" lang="x-western">What code? It only
contains the basic methods to let it compile. Any LCL
interface must have at least that.</div>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
This is what I assumed (and heard from those who tried it): It only
provides for compiling but does not offer any functionality.<br>
<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:56682B60.7040800@lumino.de" type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<div class="moz-text-plain" wrap="true" graphical-quote="true"
style="font-size: 13px;" lang="x-western">The NoGUI allows to
compile a LCL application without a GUI. It has a few lines of
code to connect the RTL. </div>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
If your intention is to say that just using the name NoGUI and
"silently" update it to something that is "active" (and with that a
"Service Application") would be more sensible than creating a newly
named Widget Type / Application Type, I don't have any problems
with that. I just though of a new name to prevent the possibility to
break any existing code.<br>
<br>
-Michael<br>
</body>
</html>