[lazarus] Components/Code needed
Marc Weustink
weus at quicknet.nl
Wed Aug 11 14:59:15 EDT 1999
At 10:52 11-08-99 -0700, you wrote:
>
>On 11-Aug-99 Shane Miller wrote:
>> TRegistry: Not usre how we want to handle this. I'm not sure if Linux has
>> some registry compatable system.
>
>This is just my opinion, but I want to open this to discussion. I think we
>should implement TRegistry in some better way than the Windows way, on Linux.
>I personally think the Registry was one of the biggest blunders I have
seen M$
>do in quite a while. In the Windows implementation, it needs to work with the
>real registry, but I don't think we should copy that same blunder in Linux.
I dont see it as a big blunder if you compare it to the situation before.
he biggest problem is that not everybody is using the registry as where it
was ment for.
It provides you general and personal settings for apps/system/etc. complete
with permissions avbout who/what is allowed to add/modify/read/remove/etc a
specific item.
>I would suggest implementing it as Conf files or something like that. As
long as
>the Interace is the same, it doesn't necessarily have to work the same.
That's correct. In fact, the windows registry consists of 4 files.
Marc
More information about the Lazarus
mailing list