[lazarus] wndproc

[Baeseman, Cliff]

makes no difference to me I am for it...

Cliff

-----Original Message-----
From: Shane Miller [mailto:SMiller1 at stvgb.org]
Sent: Monday, August 16, 1999 2:40 PM
To: lazarus at miraclec.com
Subject: Re: [lazarus] wndproc


hmmm..I see that.  I don't see why it would be bad to call
TControl(Data).wndproc(Message) instead of dispatching them right away.  I
think that would be a good idea plus it would help with our Delphi
compatability.  I would also think that this would help in making it easier
to add other widget tool sets.

Anyone against this change? 
Shane


>>> Marc Weustink <weus at quicknet.nl> 08/16 2:14 PM >>>
At 12:43 16-08-99 -0500, "Shane Miller" <SMiller1 at stvgb.org> wrote:
>wndproc is not out of favor for windows controls, but for GTK it is.  
>Each control sets a callback for EACH signal so we dispatch them that way.

>
>The msg's aren'tr being passed back yet because no one has coded them yet.

>A few of them are already coded, like keydown.
>
>I'm not sure about converting everything to use wndproc.  How does wndproc
>handle it then?  Does it simply do a dispatch?  I haven't looked at
Delphi's
>method of handling this, so I'm not awarer of it.

In delphi the WndProc is merely a big case Message.Msg of.... where finally
(in TControl) a call is made to Dispatch

Marc


_________________________________________________________________
     To unsubscribe: mail lazarus-request at miraclec.com with
                "unsubscribe" as the Subject
    archives at http://www.miraclec.com/list_archives/lazarus

_________________________________________________________________
     To unsubscribe: mail lazarus-request at miraclec.com with
                "unsubscribe" as the Subject
    archives at http://www.miraclec.com/list_archives/lazarus