[lazarus] classesh.inc change required

[Kevin Berry]

mmmm... just thought of something...
Because  "   MyVar: TMyFunc;" is present wouldn't
it still do type-checking anyway.

--- Kevin Berry <kevinbe71 at yahoo.com> wrote:
> OUCH!  You have a good point...
> I'd agree with you that using the typing is better,
> then at least the compiler can pick up the type
> mismatch.
> 
> --- Marc Weustink <Marc.Weustink at cuperus.nl> wrote:
> > Thinking of this brought me to a drawback on using
> > the @ operator.
> > Depending on the $T (or $TYPEDADDRESS) flag the
> > result of the @ operator is
> > typed or untyped. In most cases you use untyped
> > pointers (?). This means
> > that the following is correct
> > 
> > type
> >   TMyFunc: function:Integer;
> > 
> > var
> >   MyVar: TMyFunc;
> > 
> > function MyFunc:Interger;
> > function MyOtherFunc: TSomething;
> > procedure MyProc;
> > 
> > MyVar := @MyFunc;
> > MyVar := @MyOtherFunc; (??)
> > MyVar := @MyProc;      (??)
> > 
> > Marc
> > 
> > 
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Thousands of Stores.  Millions of Products.  All in
> one place.
> Yahoo! Shopping: http://shopping.yahoo.com
> 
>
_________________________________________________________________
>      To unsubscribe: mail
> lazarus-request at miraclec.com with
>                 "unsubscribe" as the Subject
>     archives at
> http://www.miraclec.com/list_archives/lazarus
> 

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Thousands of Stores.  Millions of Products.  All in one place.
Yahoo! Shopping: http://shopping.yahoo.com