[lazarus] Just another bug

Mattias Gaertner nc-gaertnma at netcologne.de
Thu Nov 14 10:08:43 EST 2002

On Thu, 14 Nov 2002 15:57:13 +0100
Florian Klaempfl <Florian.Klaempfl at gmx.de> wrote:

> At 15:16 14.11.2002, you wrote:
> > > >It has the compiler built in and simply shows the message as produced
> > > >by the compiler, which is determined by the -Fr switch.
> > > >(this may and will give problems with some locales of course. The IDE
> > > >doesn't handle that)
> > >
> > > What about writing a semi-GUI wrapper for the compiler used by
> > > lazarus? I.e. a compiler which gets all settings via IPC and returns
> > > status info the same way. So you don't have the disadvantages of an
> > > integrated compiler like a crashing compiler crashes the IDE, memory
> > > leaks caused by the compiler etc..
> >
> >Nice idea.
> >But what about compiling via makefiles and scripts?
> What do you mean with this?

For example: 
When the IDE builds lazarus it calls 'make' and parses the output for make
and fpc output. If the user has a localized fpc, the IDE can't understand

>  The IPC controlled compiler would be used only
> by the lazarus IDE to simply communication with the it and solve
> problems like the language stuff.

It will solve direct compilation. But there are enough cases, where a simple
ppc386 command is not sufficient (for example everything with


More information about the Lazarus mailing list