[lazarus] Need your thoughts on Caret
marc.weustink at cuperus.nl
Tue Aug 12 09:17:23 EDT 2003
+ From: Mattias Gaertner [mailto:nc-gaertnma at netcologne.de]
+ Sent: dinsdag 12 augustus 2003 15:52
+ On Tue, 12 Aug 2003 12:07:11 +0200
+ Micha Nelissen <M.Nelissen at student.tue.nl> wrote:
+ > Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
+ > > The keypress problem is more general: none of the examples respond to
+ > > keypresses, except where a native windows widget is used. Custom key
+ > > handling doesn't work anywhere. So that is not related to the caret...
+ > OK, will place that on the TODO. But right now, I'm interested in that
+ > caret functionality...has the synedit caret ever worked correctly then?
+ > Also when focus was removed and restored?
+ I never tried synedit under win32 interface.
+ To the keypress:
+ WM_KEYDOWN messages are sent in the win32 intf as LM_SYSKEYDOWN.
+ I thought, LM_SYSKEYDOWN is for system keys like Alt+X. I changed that.
+ Maybe you can check that.
WM_KEYDOWN should generate LM_KEYDOWN and WM_SYSKEYDOWN should generate
Syskeys are indeed keys with ALT+key
More information about the Lazarus