[lazarus] Order of destruction in TCustomListBox

[Micha Nelissen]

Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 15 Dec 2003, Micha Nelissen wrote:
> 
> 
>>Mattias Gaertner wrote:
>>
>>
>>>On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 15:09:48 +0100  Micha Nelissen <micha at neli.hopto.org>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>><output>
>>>>CB.SomeFunc call
>>>>Constructor
>>>></output>
>>>>
>>>>Which is not logical, IMHO.
>>>
>>>
>>>It is just a matter of definition. Although it would be interesting how you
>>>imagine a more logical alternative.
>>
>>The definition is: the object is only 'defined', if it's constructor has
>>run completely. Something along those lines is used by C++. After each
>>constructor run, and only then, are the overriden function pointers
>>written to the VMT. Personally, I think this is more logical, although
>>maybe it's a matter of personal taste.
> 
> 
> I can show you code where in the constructor a virtual method is called

Yes, show me the code :-).

> which does some additional initialization. The method needs to be

What kind of initialization should I be thinking about?

> virtual since the initialization is different depending on the
> descendent. That would not work in your scheme as it would be invalid
> code...

That's the only way?

Micha.