[lazarus] Request...

[Michael Van Canneyt]

On 13 Jan 2003, Tony Maro wrote:

> On Mon, 2003-01-13 at 17:16, Michael.VanCanneyt at Wisa.be wrote:
> >
> > It also remains to be seen what the future of .NET is. Looking at Java,
> > I don't think we should worry. The big Java breakthough has never taken
> > place. The first serious 100% Java app for the desktop must still be
> > coded (and tricks using JNI don't count :) ).
> >
> > So if this is the future for .NET, I don't think we'll have to hurry
> > with the implementation...
>
> We do a considerable amount of .NET programming at the office.   For web
> development when coupled with Visual Studio it RAWKES.  Especially when
> integrating with a SQL Server.

... which is written in C++ if not assembler. QED.

Michael.