[Lazarus] Universal Binaries on Mac OS X...

Dominique Louis dominique at savagesoftware.com.au
Tue Feb 19 02:00:14 CET 2008


On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 22:52:23 +0100
"Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho" <felipemonteiro.carvalho at gmail.com> wrote:

> I think we should apply the WM_COPYDATA patch.
> 
> I don't think this small modification, specially if well commented and
> documented on the wiki would alone increase the difficulty of
> developing the win32 interface.
> 
> Lazarus exists exactly to be useful for people, and if this will make
> it more useful then it's a good thing. Of course we need to balance
> that with having a consistent and easy to maintain framework, but
> being a small patch which covers an important use case I'd go for it.

Maybe it becomes an 'important use case' if it mentioned on
http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Projects_using_Lazarus

;)

We should leave the final decision to the win32 devels. They have to
maintain it the next years.

 
> Similarly I'd be against sending any message to the application,
> because it's a change with multiple repercussions.


Mattias



More information about the Lazarus mailing list