[Lazarus] Why MDI for Qt only
Kostas Michalopoulos
badsector at slashstone.com
Wed Jun 18 12:43:12 CEST 2008
> I agree, in fact some user's (me too) still prefer the old MDI style,
> but it's a matter of taste. The world is going in another direction...
I dare the "world" to make a SDI (as in non-Window-in-Window, because using
tabs is also considered MDI these days) image editing/drawing program that
doesn't have a UI that suck :-P. When you need to have two or more documents
open side by side, or maximize your document to take the whole screen except
the tools and menu, you don't want your taskbar cluttered with all open
documents, then MDI is really the solution, not matter how "old" it is.
Also i like mIRC's MDI interface because i can have multiple channels on
screen at the same time (in contrast to the tabbed approach most IRC clients
use these days which require you to switch tabs). Yes its a matter of taste,
but i don't consider it a good idea to remove stuff because some people
dislike them (generic note, it doesn't apply here, MDI isn't implemented in
Lazarus yet).
Kostas
More information about the Lazarus
mailing list