[Lazarus] Release 1.0, part 2

zeljko zeljko at holobit.net
Wed Dec 2 11:02:16 CET 2009


On Wednesday 02 December 2009 10:23, Marc Weustink wrote:
> zeljko wrote:
> > On Wednesday 02 December 2009 08:37, Paul Ishenin wrote:
> >> For 1.0 rc1 we need to fix 1.0 win32 bugs. Maybe not all the bugs in the
> >> tracker with 1.0 target are really has 1.0 target. But at least we need
> >> to review all and decide about each of them.
> >>
> >> For 1.0 rc2 we need to do the same but for the gtk2 widgetset. And here
> >> we need a help of community. We need to close all gtk1 bugs but we also
> >> need to check wether the bugs are present in our gtk2 interface. If they
> >> are present then first we need to change their widgetset to gtk2 and
> >> decide whether they are 1.0 bugs.
> >>
> >> I think 1.0 rc3 will be the last rc release and to release it we need to
> >> review remain 1.0 IDE bugs.
> >>
> >> This is my view of road to 1.0 and it can differ from ideas of other
> >> developers.
> >
> > It's nice view, but it takes only bugfixes into account.
> > 1.0 should be interface freeze also. So eg. docking should be added to
> > 1.0 rc1.
> > It's easier (not easy but easier !) to fix bugs when we have clear vision
> > of interface look.There's enough diff between 1.0rc1 .. 1.0rc3 to make
> > interface changes if needed by those bugs.
>
> Exactly, imo, Rcs should be only fixing issues encountered in the
> previous RC.

You are right if we say 0.9.30 is last interface changes version before rc1.
If we want to release 1.0 in 12 months, it's time to re-discuss roadmap and 
necessary things todo.


zeljko




More information about the Lazarus mailing list