[Lazarus] Do FPC generates old EABI code?

Florian Klaempfl florian at freepascal.org
Tue Dec 15 16:29:36 CET 2009


darekm at emadar.com schrieb:
> Can I ask:
> What is difference between CPU_TARGET=arm (with -CaEABI) and armel
> seems, that first not produce proper EABI code though it say it is
> (readelf status)
> its normal or bug or unexpected behaviour ?

Undefined behaviour. readelf just checks the header of the object file.
The header of the object file is written by the used binutils and not by
fpc.




More information about the Lazarus mailing list