[Lazarus] fillpoly in lazarus

andri tea andri.milis at gmail.com
Sat Sep 12 20:35:26 CEST 2009



On Sat, 12 Sep 2009, Marco van de Voort wrote:

> On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 12:30:17PM +0200, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
>>> That unit might require functionality that is not yet there, because
>>> Codegear
>>> does all new units in a static class style. (class var/const etc)
>>
>> Yes, I saw that during one of their D2010 launch-sessions. Any idea why
>> they do this? Is it just a .Net-me-too?
>
> Yes I think so. Pretty much with everything, same with the new RTTI modifier
> stuff in front of a declaration, instead after it. When I asked a question
> about that, they were even surprised I doubted it at all. (worse, it was Bob
> Swart!)
>
> However due to the reaction of the audience (I went to a D2010 introduction
> by Barnsten yesterday), specially from the younger crowd, the public opinion
> seems to be this is absolutely great functionality.

I still haven't seen any practical use for the new RTTI modifier stuff. 
I made some comments on some websites, but everybody keeps nagging about 
the persistent storage uses. Which is a basically flawed use of the feature.
No-one has provided an alternative use yet :(

Michael.




More information about the Lazarus mailing list