[Lazarus] const array syntax
Paul Ishenin
webpirat at mail.ru
Tue Jan 12 14:59:39 CET 2010
Jürgen Hestermann wrote:
> That's an issue, yes. Although, in this case the constant "auto" could
> be independend from the keyword "auto". So it would not fail. Instead
> constant and array size would not be related in any way (although it
> appears like that).
I can't. How compiler will decide whether this is a constant 'auto' or a
keyword inside the const declaration?
>> I would go for
>> arr: [1..] of Integer = (1, 2, 3);
Maybe, but this can lead to ocasional errors. What if developer forgot
to write the paticular value on which program execution depends.
I would use arr[] of Integer as in C. This would also simplify code
porting :)
Best regards,
Paul Ishenin.
More information about the Lazarus
mailing list