[Lazarus] CSV parser class

Vladimir Zhirov vvzh.lists at gmail.com
Fri Jan 22 19:32:28 CET 2010

Zitat von Alexander Klenin <klenin at gmail.com>:

> 2010/1/22 Mattias Gärtner <nc-gaertnma at netcologne.de>:
>> Zitat von Alexander Klenin <klenin at gmail.com>:
>>> I continue refactoring of PropEdits unit.
>>> I am ready to extract TPropertyEditHook into a separate unit.
>>> Although Paul have given me commit access to IDEIntf,
>>> he requested that I ask before committing serious changes.
>>> So, is it ok to commit this refactoring?
>> No, it breaks compatibility.
> What compatibility?
> I have successfully re-built lazarus after the refactoring -- no files except
> propedits.pp required any changes.

Amazing, TPropertyEditHook is used in some IDE units.
What exactly do you want to move?

>> Why do you want to move it to another unit?
> Because propedits.pp is a 6000+ line monster which is
> very hard to comprehend, fix and improve.
> Reducing the size by 1200 lines will alleviate the problem somewhat.
> Also, many units that currently import propedits are actually only
> using TPropertyEditHook, so after the extraction those units
> can import much lighter propedithook unit instead.

I can't follow you.
a) TPropertyEditHook is not used anywhere then moving will not break  
b) TPropertyEditHook is used in many units then moving will break  

With "compatibility" I mean the designtime packages that use IDEIntf.

What about GlobalDesignHook?

> Note that the patch I have currently prepared does not
> implement the latter change yet, but it will follow shortly.

ok. Hopefully it will clarify some things. :)


More information about the Lazarus mailing list