[Lazarus] PageControl vs NoteBook vs TabControl
Graeme Geldenhuys
graemeg.lists at gmail.com
Mon Mar 8 07:40:19 CET 2010
Andreas Schneider het geskryf:
>
> Here's a problem: TNotebook is _not_ a tab-type component (well, actually it
> shouldn't be a tab-type component). The Delphi implementation is more or
> less just a page manager so you can have several layers on one form that you
> can switch between.
To me, that is exactly what a tab-type component is.
> That's why it would also be important to have no borders
Well how hard can it no be to add a new "with borders" or "without borders"
property to the TNotebook. This minor detail still doesn't justify a
complete separate component.
> on it. IMHO it's a very useful component (if implemented like in Delphi) -
> at least for smaller self-contained dialogs where frames would be "too
> much".
Yes, another option that says: Show/Hide tabs. Again, no reason to have two
components that do exactly the same.
> A TabControl in contrast to a PageControl has _no_ pages. It really only
> consists of tabs, so it isn't a container in any way.
Fine, I can see the difference with a TabControl, but the difference
between a PageControl and a Notebook control is stupid. The later two could
be rolled into one single component.
> So a PageControl is essentially a TabControl+Notebook.
OS/2 has Notebook control that displayed tabs. So does many X11 widgetsets.
I believe so does the Delphi Notebook control. It's just a different name
for the exact same thing.
Rolled into one, they would reduce maintenance, increase stability (because
everybody use the same component).
Regards,
- Graeme -
--
fpGUI Toolkit - a cross-platform GUI toolkit using Free Pascal
http://opensoft.homeip.net/fpgui/
More information about the Lazarus
mailing list