[Lazarus] Release schedule and policy

[Lukasz Sokol]

On 25/10/2010 10:07, Marco van de Voort wrote:

> 
> The whole point of the others is that the current setup already strains
> resources, specially during release preparation times.

I.e you needed a volunteer to step up and propose himself to do this,
and somebody did. (i.e. Juha, Vincent)

> 
> Maintaining any extra branches (e.g. splitting trunk into "more stable" and
> "less stable") requires a management effort, which is why it is not done.
> (and it could be perfectly done with SVN. It is the work and the management
> that is the problem, not the tool)
> 
> Maybe I am misunderstanding the discussion, but that is because all these
> proposals are very vague, rely on workflow of external projects, and the
> people don't seem to have a clue about the current FPC/Lazarus workflow, and
> where the bottlenecks are.
> 

They are vague, because they need to fit all interested peoples' work flows.

They don't rely on work flow of other projects, they take an example from them
- they try to get in whatever-good people invented somewhere else, to benefit our cause.

Is the current workflow described somewhere detailed enough that comments can be made?

Lukasz