[Lazarus] Compiling only LCL to 64-bit, on Windows

[Florian Klaempfl]

Am 25.08.2011 17:19, schrieb Andreas Schneider:
> On 25.08.2011 17:09, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
>> On 08/25/2011 05:06 PM, Andreas Schneider wrote:
>>>
>>> Although slightly off-topic, but SVN's revert is not really clean. It
>>> reverts files it knows, but it doesn't remove unknown files. I'm not
>>> aware of an SVN equivalent of Mercurial's purge (for example).
>>> So yes, a clean checkout CAN make sense sometimes.
>>
>> svn revert .
>> svn export<target_dir>
> 
> Still not the same. Export would also remove .svn metadata, which is not
> what I (would) want. What I want is to remove all files that aren't
> tracked by SVN - i.e. get the working copy to be EXACTLY what a fresh
> checkout would be; no more, no less.

If you don't use TortoiseSVN I guess it's shouldn't be to hard to feed
sed with svn st output to remove untracked files. Why should svn do this
if a sed one liner can do this ;)?

> 
>> Then use the<target_dir>  as a "clean" directory. But yes, SVN still
>> sucks big time compared to Mercurial or Git.
> 
> Oh yes. /signed ;-)
> 

So they got finally proper cherry pick tracking and blocking ;)?