[Lazarus] Compiling only LCL to 64-bit, on Windows
Flávio Etrusco
flavio.etrusco at gmail.com
Thu Aug 25 17:42:25 CEST 2011
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Henry Vermaak <henry.vermaak at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 25/08/11 16:23, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
>>
>> Am 25.08.2011 17:19, schrieb Andreas Schneider:
>>>
>>> On 25.08.2011 17:09, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 08/25/2011 05:06 PM, Andreas Schneider wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Although slightly off-topic, but SVN's revert is not really clean. It
>>>>> reverts files it knows, but it doesn't remove unknown files. I'm not
>>>>> aware of an SVN equivalent of Mercurial's purge (for example).
>>>>> So yes, a clean checkout CAN make sense sometimes.
>>>>
>>>> svn revert .
>>>> svn export<target_dir>
>>>
>>> Still not the same. Export would also remove .svn metadata, which is not
>>> what I (would) want. What I want is to remove all files that aren't
>>> tracked by SVN - i.e. get the working copy to be EXACTLY what a fresh
>>> checkout would be; no more, no less.
>>
>> If you don't use TortoiseSVN I guess it's shouldn't be to hard to feed
>> sed with svn st output to remove untracked files. Why should svn do this
>> if a sed one liner can do this ;)?
>
> Indeed. Just remember to use svn st --no-ignore and catch both "I" and "?".
> Or use --xml and parse that. I'm sure I've got a script somewhere that
> does this.
>
> Henry
I usually file bugs if 'make distclean' leaves files behind ;-)
Otherwise: http://carlo-notes.blogspot.com/2011/01/throw-out-trash-clean-up-subversion.html
-Flávio
More information about the Lazarus
mailing list