[Lazarus] Documentation update (CHM building, lazutils)
Hans-Peter Diettrich
DrDiettrich1 at aol.com
Fri Dec 30 18:40:34 CET 2011
Sven Barth schrieb:
> On 30.12.2011 16:23, Marco van de Voort wrote:
>>> Dunno, I also wonder when this (Unicode strings) change will be really
>>> finished :-(
>>
>> I don't know what that has to do with it. Current docs describe the 2.6
>> branch not the 2.7 branch which has unicodestrings. But these files are
>> already unmaintained from before the 2.6 branch existed, so I don't know
>> what they are for.
>
> They are code page aware strings, not unicodestrings. :)
>
> That are two different string types and the latter existed already in
> 2.4 and maybe earlier ;)
I wonder how strings with different encoding will work together, without
kind of Unicode strings - be UTF-8 or UTF-16.
I also wonder what's the benefit of using strings with different
encodings together, when every other string operation will require a
codepage translation...
DoDi
More information about the Lazarus
mailing list