[Lazarus] Does Lazarus support a complete Unicode Component Library?
José Mejuto
joshyfun at gmail.com
Tue Feb 15 19:08:57 CET 2011
Hello Lazarus-List,
Tuesday, February 15, 2011, 4:27:40 PM, you wrote:
MvdV> There is a solution that you can take FPC and Lazarus libraries out of the
MvdV> equation by splitting each target into an one and two byte encoding
MvdV> platform. That should fix the bulk of the problem.
[...]
MvdV> Update to what? The point is that neither of both most used encodings (UTF8/16) is
MvdV> is going away anything soon, and the split is right through platforms.
So you are talking about a "platform" about the encoding, but in any
operative system platform, this means you can choose RTL Linux 32 bits
WideString or RTL Linux 32 bits UTF8, do not ?
>> Using a different RTL for each encoding is even worst IMHO. But this
>> is just a simple opinion.
MvdV> Let's here the argumentation for that then.
Well, maybe I misunderstood the platform split...
--
Best regards,
José
More information about the Lazarus
mailing list