[Lazarus] Documentation style

[Jürgen Hestermann]

Mattias Gaertner schrieb:
 >> Then no extra documentation is needed.[...]
 > How to distinguish an item that needs documentation and an
 > item that does not need documentation?

Well, if the current documentation just repeats the name (with 
fillwords) then it is useless IMO and should be deleted. But I didn't 
mean that in these cases documentation is not *needed*, just the 
opposite. I think that all functions/methods/language 
constructs/types/... should be documented. It's just that the *current* 
documenation is often useless because of its simple name repeat. The 
important information about side effects and internal structure is 
missing often.