[Lazarus] [TIP]: Installing Lazarus under Linux via SVN (Ubuntu 11.04 or later)

[Mattias Gaertner]

On Mon, 6 Jun 2011 11:42:39 -0300
Marcos Douglas <md at delfire.net> wrote:

> On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Mattias Gaertner
> <nc-gaertnma at netcologne.de> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 6 Jun 2011 10:00:10 -0300
> > Marcos Douglas <md at delfire.net> wrote:
> >
> > > 2011/6/3 Mattias Gaertner <nc-gaertnma at netcologne.de>:
> > > >
> > > > Then you found a bug.
> > >
> > > Mattias,
> > >
> > > I saw that bug[1] was 'resolved'. Sorry not answer before, but I was very busy.
> > >
> > > So, I updated my SVN Lazarus to 31119 rev. I did not see any changes
> > > about lazbuild... but I saw in /trunk (remember, I use
> > > /branches/fixes_0_9_30).
> > > The problem was fixed in /trunk (I did not test), but do not in
> > > /branches/fixes_0_9_30?
> > >
> > > [1] http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=19474
> >
> > This change is not a simple fix, but changes the behavior of lazbuild.
> > Formerly lazbuild created a lazarus.new.exe. Users with build scripts
> > might expect this. So this change breaks compatibility and should not go
> > the fixes branch.
> > I didn't test, but I guess 0.9.28 did the same.
> 
> OK, I understand.
> So, I can use 'make clean all' and 'lazbuild --build-ide
> --pcp=<my_path>' and the script will be create a lazarus.new.exe, not
> a lazarus.exe.
> Simply my script could uses 'ren' command (on Windows) to rename this
> new binary?

Yes.

 
> You marked 'resolved'. So, you confirmed my suspicions? Just to be clear.

The lazbuild of 0.9.31 creates a lazarus.exe.

Mattias