bartjunk64 at gmail.com
Fri Jun 24 00:51:14 CEST 2011
@Martin: Sorry I misunderstood you apparantly ...
@Mattias: I posted a patch in Mantis:
If you agree, can you apply it (I suppose you have the proper commit
rights on svn)?
On 6/24/11, Martin <lazarus at mfriebe.de> wrote:
> On 23/06/2011 23:00, Bart wrote:
>> On 6/23/11, Martin<lazarus at mfriebe.de> wrote:
>>> frDisableEntireScope would be required if the EntireSciop is the same as
>>> the normal search.
>>> E.g if no backward search is allowed, and your are at the start of the
>>> text. Then you are doing entire scope anyway.
>>> If your scope is "the selected adres-list" versus "all address lists",
>>> but you only have one list, then it is always entirescope too.
>> But in my case the search always is the entire scope anyway
> I understood your case.
> The case of having to hide the checkbox was bever questioned.
> But a question was raised, if disabling of the checkbox could ever be
> required. So I came up with the best example I could find. (admittedly,
> not very good)
>> Would it hurt anyone if the option to not display the checkbox would
>> be implemented (and the default stays as is)?
> IMHO, Go ahead
> Lazarus mailing list
> Lazarus at lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
More information about the Lazarus