[Lazarus] Circular references and code quality

Mattias Gaertner nc-gaertnma at netcologne.de
Tue Oct 4 18:32:17 CEST 2011


 


"Jürgen Hestermann" <juergen.hestermann at gmx.de> hat am 4. Oktober 2011 um 17:41
geschrieben:

>  > In other words: It's nicer to work with ten 3000 lines units than
> with one big 30.000 lines unit.
>
> Why that? I would prefer the one unit including everything over having
> multiple files (i.e. when searching for something). If it has no other
> impact than I would always vote for having lesser files instead of
> cluttering all into many files. 
It's matter of taste. I only gave one possible reason for splitting up classes.
Everyone has to decide when it is appropriate and when not. Obviously the limits
vary with every programmer. 
 
 

>
> > 2. classes were split instead of using parameterization. Instead of
> adding a parameter to many methods, an abstract class and multiple
> descendants are defined. This almost always duplicates code, but the
> code itself has far less if-then-else blocks. OTOH it can create more
> if-then-else outside the split classes.
>
> Code is much more readable (understandable) when if-then-else blocks and
> no OP-methods (like descendants) are used. You see all relevant code in
> one block and there is no need to gather it from multiple places. 
Well, that is not true in general.  
 
 

>[...] 
Mattias
 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lazarus-ide.org/pipermail/lazarus/attachments/20111004/1be7ccd2/attachment-0003.html>


More information about the Lazarus mailing list