[Lazarus] LCL Message handling

[Hans-Peter Diettrich]

Paul Ishenin schrieb:
> 20.10.2011 0:27, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
>> Since no message IDs exist for other platforms, I'd assume that the LM
>> messages are equivalent to the WM IDs. But why new names for old names?
> 
> Can you give some examples of new names? Or you just complain about LM_ 
> and WM_ prefixes?

I e.g. wonder about method names like WMNotify, associated with an 
LM_NOTIFY message ID.


> Prefixes are different to show that message can be not the same as 
> windows passed it. So it just warns developer that it not exact windows 
> message.

This would be an acceptable explanation.

DoDi