[Lazarus] Single-stepping assembler

[Mark Morgan Lloyd]

Mattias Gaertner wrote:

>>> Is there any particular reason that you're redefining O_NONBLOCK, 
>>> rather than using the one from BaseUnix?
>> I didn't.
>>
>> I am mainly windows. I have linux in a VM for testing.  I did use libs, 
>> I was told I can't. Mattias provided the IdeMiniLibc. Where he took the 
>> values from I do not know.
> 
> The C header files I found on Linux.
> 
>  
>> If baseunix can be used then that is probably fine too.
> 
> At the time of writing the value did not exist in the BaseUnix.
> The IDEMiniLibc has a comment about only putting things there that do
> not exist in the RTL.
> If the value now exists, then it should be removed from IDEMiniLibc.

It's certainly in 2.2.0 if not earlier, and as I've observed Lazarus now 
requires >2.4.4 to build.

-- 
Mark Morgan Lloyd
markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk

[Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues]