[Lazarus] Lazarus 1.0 is branched

zeljko zeljko at holobit.net
Mon Apr 2 13:54:15 CEST 2012


On Monday 02 of April 2012 10:00:19 Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
> zeljko at holobit.net schrieb:
> > Hi all,
> > As I've already mentioned few weeks ago on lazdevel, today we branched
> > 1.0 :)
> > 
> > branch is here:
> > http://svn.freepascal.org/svn/lazarus/branches/fixes_1_0/
> 
> What's the update policy? I just updated examples/fpdocmanager, do I
> have to update the new branch, too? If so, what's the suggested
> procedure for updates that should go into both the branch(es) and trunk?

No, just add which revisions need to be merged to fixes_1_0 here
http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Lazarus_1.0_fixes_branch


> 
> Which FPC version is suggested/assumed for 1.x?
> 
> > wiki with revisions which have to be merged from trunk (also there will
> > be links about other 1.0 stuff like changes etc):
> > http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Lazarus_1.0_fixes_branch
> > or
> > http://wiki.freepascal.org/Lazarus_1.0_fixes_branch
> 
> What's the difference (in content)?

no difference, both addresses point to the same page.

> 
> > Current trunk version 0.9.31 is 1.1 as of r36507.
> > 
> > 1.In next days snapshots will be versioned as 1.1
> > 2.For testers:
> > svn co http://svn.freepascal.org/svn/lazarus/branches/fixes_1_0 lazarus
> > 3.We are planning to release 1.0 in next 3 months, but before that we
> > will relese 1..XX RC candidates - you'll be informed about it.
> > 
> > Happy Lazarus 1.0 !
> 
> What's the future of dragging in 1.0? Will fixes (workarounds) be added
> to make the dockable IDE work? By conditional compilation, at least?

Don't know ... you should ask Paul or Mattias about it.

zeljko

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lazarus-ide.org/pipermail/lazarus/attachments/20120402/f67a5c91/attachment-0003.html>


More information about the Lazarus mailing list