[Lazarus] Lazarus 1.0 is branched

Marcos Douglas md at delfire.net
Thu Apr 5 03:28:58 CEST 2012


On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 10:17 PM, waldo kitty <wkitty42 at windstream.net> wrote:
> On 4/4/2012 20:34, Marcos Douglas wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Vincent Snijders wrote:
>>>
>>> Did you recompile startlazarus?
>>
>>
>> To recompile Lazarus I just use the IDE.. I thought the command Build
>> All recompile everything. If not, how I recompile the startlazarus?
>
>
> as mattias and i have been discussing, the easiest way is "make clean"
> before "svn up"... then "make all" after that... then you can use lazbuild
> to build based on profiles (eg: "debug ide", "normal ide", "optimized ide"
> which are all defaults) and those would also include your own defined
> profiles just the same as in the IDE... provided that i've been following
> along and understanding... as such, i just reported a bug today wherein
> lazbuild still builds debug versions when it is not supposed to do so... i'm
> hoping this is fixed and working properly when laz v1.0 is released in
> another few months...

For FPC I always use "make distclean" before update from SVN and then
"make [...]" using my script.
I never used lazbuild. The IDE can do this, why complicate? ;-)

> my setup is based off of (your??) wiki instructions for total SVN starting
> of FPC and lazarus... i've been working on an updatelaz script (.bat file on
> winwhatever) which is now working for the basic needs... just to get the
> above mentioned bug fixed and life will be golden again :P ;)

Yes, I wrote the Installation instructions to use FPC and Lazarus from
SVN to Win32. After someone improved the scripts.

I have a new script that I improved to compile FPC (32 and 64 using
cross) with some optionals parameters etc. But to Lazarus the IDE
works very fine.
Today I saw this little "problem" in the splash form... well, I can
compile startlazarus some times, that is very simple too.

Marcos Douglas




More information about the Lazarus mailing list