[Lazarus] Best practices on using classes for subroutine libraries

[Frank Church]

On 10 April 2012 12:28, Marcos Douglas <md at delfire.net> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 1:07 AM, Frank Church <vfclists at gmail.com> wrote:
>> When I need a variation in procedures (standalone, not a class or
>> object procedure) I use across my applications, I often find it more
>> convenient to create a copy the unit into the project folder and make
>> the changes there. Sometimes they get merged back into the shared unit
>> or not at all.
>>
>> I am thinking now of using classes with procedures, without any data
>> in them, so that I subclass them in the projects where I need to
>> change them. Are the some good examples and some known good working
>> practices on working with procedures in this way?
>
> I do this. Sometimes I prefer encapsulate subroutines (LCL, RTL, 3rd
> etc) in static classes.
>
> TmyFoo = class
> public
>  class procedure Exec; static;
> end;
>

Do you have some examples to show how it is done?

Are there some examples in the FCL/LCL etc


> Marcos Douglas
>
> --
> _______________________________________________
> Lazarus mailing list
> Lazarus at lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
> http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus



-- 
Frank Church

=======================
http://devblog.brahmancreations.com