[Lazarus] Lazarus 1.0 release candidate 1 available for download

[Reinier Olislagers]

On 14-8-2012 12:56, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
> Kostas Michalopoulos wrote:
> 
>> 2. Under Windows the Windows CHM viewer should be used instead of
>> lhelp since it is more feature complete (the html pages are rendered
>> better there).
> 
> The Lazarus IDE knows how to tell lhelp to change page or shut down.
> Does it know how to drive the MS CHM viewer in the same way?
I suppose it doesn't ;)

> I agree that using the same viewer is desirable for- at least- cosmetic
> reasons, but not if it sacrifices basic functionality.
Also, lhelp is cross platform and using that across the board simplifies
maintenance (at least gives more chances of bugs being detected).

Finally, I'm not sure if the native .chm viewer is distributed with
Windows anymore or packaged with an IDE or optional update.