[Lazarus] Documentation contribution

[Jürgen Hestermann]

Martin schrieb:
 > However, if the person, who founds it has the ability to add a note, 
then he can also immediately correct it. Knowing it is misleading, does 
imply knowing what it was meant to say. So rewording the existing 
content should be possible.

In general this is not correct. If I see that variables mentioned in the 
documentation do not exist in the source I don't know automatically 
which variables to replace them with (if any). Or when I tested things 
and find that it does not behave as mentioned in the documentation I 
also don't know how it's meant to work.


 > If he person is not sure, about it being misleading or not, but 
believes it might be. Then better ask first before  adding a note

You know that this is impractical if you need to wait for an answer each 
time you stumble over errors. What happens if no one has an answer 
(within a given time)?