[Lazarus] Should the "at" word be painted as reserved word ?

[Bernd]

2012/2/12 ik <idokan at gmail.com>:

> Raise Exception.Create('') at get_caller_frame(get_frame);
>
> Does not paint the "at" code as reserve word.
> It is not a reserved word according to the documentation, but on this
> specific case, it act as one imho.

According to my "Sprachgefühl" this cannot be anything other than a
reserved word. Its not an identifier, its not an operator, it can only
be a reserved word.

> Do you think like me, that it should be painted on this case as a reserve
> word ?

+1