[Lazarus] Documentation contribution
waldo kitty
wkitty42 at windstream.net
Mon Feb 13 04:26:37 CET 2012
On 2/11/2012 06:26, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
> My viewpoint is different, I would never start using a product where I found the
> documenation incomplete or wrong. That's why I started to fill the gaps in the
> existing documentation, and to point to all those places where I could not find
> out the truth myself.
+1000000000000~
>>> Such an entry is absolutely useless without instructions *what* should be
>>> implemented at all. If you can't see that yourself, then you better keep
>>> your hands off the documentation.
>>
>> It doesn't matter if it wasnt good before. Your [?] tags make it worse.
>
> They are *intended* to make it *so* worse, that the gurus (Lazarus team) finally
> decide to contribute the required documentation, instead of only inventing new
> features :-]
+100000000000000000000000000000000000000000000~
> As a doctor would say: cure the disease, not only the symptoms.
i haven't heard one of the state that but i kow i have tossed it at them
numerous times :P
More information about the Lazarus
mailing list