[Lazarus] Should the "at" word be painted as reserved word ?

[Sven Barth]

Am 15.02.2012 12:03, schrieb Marco van de Voort:
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 11:51:27AM +0100, Sven Barth wrote:
>>>>
>>>> At is not a reserved word. It works only in the context of a raise
>>>> statement.
>>>
>>> How is this different from "until" ?
>>
>> Maybe because the "at" was introduced rather late by Borland and then
>> they didn't want to break compatibility with code that uses "at" as a
>> variable or something. "until" is in the language for a long time
>> (Delphi language, not Pascal language). Same with words like "helper",
>> "read", "write", "default", "requires", "contains". They were all
>> introduced afterwards (though there seem to be exceptions, so it's not
>> easy to decide whether something is a global keyword or a context
>> sensitive one).
>
> That was what I thought too initially. But there is also a gramatical
> difference that in the case of repeat..until there is a zero or more
> intermittent statements, while in the case of raise .. at there is one, and
> only exactly one expression?

What does this have to do with whether this is a keyword or not?

Regards,
Sven