[Lazarus] Should the "at" word be painted as reserved word ?

[Marco van de Voort]

On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 12:12:38PM +0100, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
> >>> be a reserved word.
> >> At is not a reserved word. It works only in the context of a raise 
> >> statement.
> > 
> > How is this different from "until" ?
> 
> Borland made a distinction between *reserved* words and *directives*. 
> Reserved words cannot be used as identifiers, while directives are 
> recognized as something special only in their related context, and can 
> be used as identifiers in all other places. If you ever happened to 
> write a break() or exit() procedure, you'll have noticed that your 
> remaining code may fail with very strange errors, because these take 
> precedence over the language-defined behaviour of "break" or "exit".

I do know what they are. This thread is about the why.